UI Verify vs Percy
Replay your tests, let an agent review them, at a fraction of Percy’s price
Percy does the same core job: screenshot, diff, review, gate the pull request. UI Verify replays the tests you already have instead of asking you to author snapshot calls, adds an AI judge that reads your pull request’s intent, and bills a fraction of Percy’s price at every paid volume.
10,000 snapshots a month, free, versus Percy's 5,000.
Pro includes 65,000 snapshots at $199 a month. Percy's $199 Desktop plan includes 10,000.
$0.004 over your plan versus Percy's $0.036 on the Desktop plan.
Pricing, side by side
Both tools bill per screenshot, one render per browser and width, so the volumes compare like for like. UI Verify includes far more on every tier and charges a ninth as much once you go over.
| UI Verify | Percy | |
|---|---|---|
| Free | 10,000 snapshots | 5,000 snapshots |
| Entry plan | $89/mo · 30,000 | $199/mo · 10,000 |
| Next tier | $199/mo · 65,000 | $599/mo · 25,000 |
| Over your plan | $0.004 / snapshot | $0.036 to $0.048 / snapshot |
Percy prices are its annual-billing rates from browserstack.com/pricing, August 2026 (month-to-month billing runs higher). UI Verify pricing from our own plans.
What you’d actually pay
Monthly bill at a given number of billed snapshots, on the cheapest plan that covers it.
The same 50,000 snapshots, two bills
UI Verify
- Plan · 30,000 snapshots included
- $89
- 20,000 over × $0.004
- $80
Total / month
$169
Percy
- Plan · 10,000 snapshots included
- $199
- 40,000 over × $0.036
- $1,440
Total / month
$1,639
That is $1,470 a month that stays with you, at Percy’s annual-billing list price.
| Snapshots / month | UI Verify | Percy | You save |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10,000 | Free | $199 | $199/mo |
| 25,000 | $89 | $599 | $510/mo |
| 50,000 | $169 | $1,639 | $1,470/mo |
| 100,000 | $339 | $3,439 | $3,100/mo |
Percy list pricing from browserstack.com/pricing, August 2026. UI Verify pricing from our own plans. Both tools skip unchanged screens, so your billed count is typically far below your full UI on either.
Beyond price
Percy has an AI review agent and an MCP path of its own, so the honest difference is elsewhere: how the tests get wired, how flake is prevented, and whether you want a standalone tool or a module inside BrowserStack. Percy needs its CLI plus snapshot calls added through your tests. UI Verify replays an archive of the test run you already have.
| UI Verify | Percy | |
|---|---|---|
| AI review labels each change (intended or a regression) | ||
| Coding agent reviews builds over MCP | ||
| Replays your existing tests, no snapshot calls to author | ||
| Capture-time determinism (fonts, randomness, network pinned) | ||
| Standalone service, not a module inside a platform | ||
| Native app and real-device testing |
When Percy is the better choice
Percy is the right call when you need what BrowserStack is built on: native iOS and Android app visual testing, real mobile devices, and the widest matrix of real OS and browser environments. And if your functional testing already lives on BrowserStack, Percy plugs into the same platform, billing, and dashboards. UI Verify is the better fit when you test web UI, want your existing tests replayed without new snapshot calls, and care about the bill.
Comparing other tools too? See UI Verify vs Chromatic and UI Verify vs Applitools.
Switch in an afternoon
Your first build sets fresh baselines, and you can run UI Verify alongside Percy while you compare. Start free with 10,000 snapshots a month, no credit card.